Katalog CWE

CWE-825 · Słabość

Expired Pointer Dereference

Abstrakcja
Bazowa
Status
Niekompletny
Dodano
22 września 2010
Ostatnia zmiana
11 grudnia 2025

Podatności CVE z tą słabościąPełny wpis na cwe.mitre.org ↗

Opis

The product dereferences a pointer that contains a location for memory that was previously valid, but is no longer valid.

When a product releases memory, but it maintains a pointer to that memory, then the memory might be re-allocated at a later time. If the original pointer is accessed to read or write data, then this could cause the product to read or modify data that is in use by a different function or process. Depending on how the newly-allocated memory is used, this could lead to a denial of service, information exposure, or code execution.

Inne nazwy

Dangling pointer

Skutki

  • Confidentiality

    Read Memory

    If the expired pointer is used in a read operation, an attacker might be able to control data read in by the application.

  • Availability

    DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart

    If the expired pointer references a memory location that is not accessible to the product, or points to a location that is "malformed" (such as NULL) or larger than expected by a read or write operation, then a crash may occur.

  • Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability

    Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands

    If the expired pointer is used in a function call, or points to unexpected data in a write operation, then code execution may be possible.

Zapobieganie

  • Architecture and Design

    Choose a language that provides automatic memory management.

  • Implementation

    When freeing pointers, be sure to set them to NULL once they are freed. However, the utilization of multiple or complex data structures may lower the usefulness of this strategy.

Przykłady podatności

Słabość nadrzędna

Może prowadzić do

Słabości podrzędne

Kiedy powstaje

Dotyczy

Memory-Unsafe, C, C++

Uwagi

There are close relationships between incorrect pointer dereferences and other weaknesses related to buffer operations. There may not be sufficient community agreement regarding these relationships. Further study is needed to determine when these relationships are chains, composites, perspective/layering, or other types of relationships. As of September 2010, most of the relationships are being captured as chains.

Many weaknesses related to pointer dereferences fall under the general term of "memory corruption" or "memory safety." As of September 2010, there is no commonly-used terminology that covers the lower-level variants.

Źródła

  1. AddressSanitizer

Wpis z katalogu CWE 4.20.