Katalog CWE

CWE-125 · Słabość

Out-of-bounds Read

Abstrakcja
Bazowa
Status
Szkic
Dodano
19 lipca 2006
Ostatnia zmiana
11 grudnia 2025

Podatności CVE z tą słabościąPełny wpis na cwe.mitre.org ↗

Opis

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Inne nazwy

OOB read
Shorthand for "Out of bounds" read

Skutki

  • Confidentiality

    Read Memory

    An attacker could get secret values such as cryptographic keys, PII, memory addresses, or other information that could be used in additional attacks.

  • Confidentiality

    Bypass Protection Mechanism

    Out-of-bounds memory could contain memory addresses or other information that can be used to bypass ASLR and other protection mechanisms in order to improve the reliability of exploiting a separate weakness for code execution.

  • Availability

    DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart

    An attacker could cause a segmentation fault or crash by causing memory to be read outside of the bounds of the buffer. This is especially likely when the code reads a variable amount of data and assumes that a sentinel exists to stop the read operation, such as a NUL in a string.

  • Other

    Varies by Context

    The read operation could produce other undefined or unexpected results.

Zapobieganie

  • Implementation · Input Validation

    Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

    When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."

    Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

    To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

  • Architecture and Design · Language Selection

    Use a language that provides appropriate memory abstractions.

Przykłady podatności

Słabość nadrzędna

Słabości podrzędne

Kiedy powstaje

Dotyczy

Memory-Unsafe, C, C++, ICS/OT

Źródła

  1. Breaking the memory secrecy assumption — Raoul Strackx, Yves Younan, Pieter Philippaerts, Frank Piessens, Sven Lachmund, Thomas Walter, ACM, 2009
  2. The info leak era on software exploitation — Fermin J. Serna, 2012
  3. 24 Deadly Sins of Software Security — Michael Howard, David LeBlanc, John Viega, "Sin 5: Buffer Overruns." Page 89, McGraw-Hill, 2010
  4. AddressSanitizer

Wpis z katalogu CWE 4.20.