CWE-306 · Słabość
Missing Authentication for Critical Function
- Abstrakcja
- Bazowa
- Status
- Szkic
- Ryzyko wykorzystania
- wysokie
- Dodano
- 19 lipca 2006
- Ostatnia zmiana
- 11 grudnia 2025
Opis
The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
Skutki
Access Control, Other
Gain Privileges or Assume Identity; Varies by Context
Exposing critical functionality essentially provides an attacker with the privilege level of that functionality. The consequences will depend on the associated functionality, but they can range from reading or modifying sensitive data, accessing administrative or other privileged functionality, or possibly even executing arbitrary code.
Zapobieganie
Architecture and Design
Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability.
Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port.
In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design
Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks.
In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
Implementation, System Configuration, Operation
When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].
Przykłady podatności
- CVE-2024-11680 File-sharing PHP product does not check if user is logged in during requests for PHP library files under an includes/ directory, allowing configuration changes, code execution, and other impacts.
- CVE-2022-31260 Chain: a digital asset management program has an undisclosed backdoor in the legacy version of a PHP script (CWE-912) that could allow an unauthenticated user to export metadata (CWE-306)
- CVE-2022-29951 TCP-based protocol in Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) has no authentication.
- CVE-2022-29952 Condition Monitor firmware uses a protocol that does not require authentication.
- CVE-2022-30276 SCADA-based protocol for bridging WAN and LAN traffic has no authentication.
- CVE-2022-30313 Safety Instrumented System uses proprietary TCP protocols with no authentication.
- CVE-2022-30317 Distributed Control System (DCS) uses a protocol that has no authentication.
- CVE-2021-21972 Chain: Cloud computing virtualization platform does not require authentication for upload of a tar format file (CWE-306), then uses .. path traversal sequences (CWE-23) in the file to access unexpected files, as exploited in the wild per CISA KEV.
- CVE-2020-10263 Bluetooth speaker does not require authentication for the debug functionality on the UART port, allowing root shell access
- CVE-2021-23147 WiFi router does not require authentication for its UART port, allowing adversaries with physical access to execute commands as root
- CVE-2021-37415 IT management product does not perform authentication for some REST API requests, as exploited in the wild per CISA KEV.
- CVE-2020-13927 Default setting in workflow management product allows all API requests without authentication, as exploited in the wild per CISA KEV.
- CVE-2002-1810 MFV. Access TFTP server without authentication and obtain configuration file with sensitive plaintext information.
- CVE-2008-6827 Agent software running at privileges does not authenticate incoming requests over an unprotected channel, allowing a Shatter" attack.
- CVE-2004-0213 Product enforces restrictions through a GUI but not through privileged APIs.
- CVE-2020-15483 monitor device allows access to physical UART debug port without authentication
- CVE-2019-9201 Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) does not have an authentication feature on its communication protocols.
Słabość nadrzędna
Słabości podrzędne
Kiedy powstaje
- Architecture and Design — OMISSION: This weakness is caused by missing a security tactic during the architecture and design phase.
- Architecture and Design — Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port.
- Operation — When migrating data to the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), there is a risk of losing the protections that were originally provided by hosting on internal networks. If access does not require authentication, it can be easier for attackers to access the data from anywhere on the Internet.
Dotyczy
Not Language-Specific, Cloud Computing, ICS/OT
Źródła
- The Art of Software Security Assessment — Mark Dowd, John McDonald, Justin Schuh, Chapter 2, "Common Vulnerabilities of Authentication," Page 36, Addison Wesley, 2006
- Top 25 Series - Rank 19 - Missing Authentication for Critical Function — Frank Kim, SANS Software Security Institute, 2010
- OWASP Enterprise Security API (ESAPI) Project — OWASP
- OT:ICEFALL: The legacy of "insecure by design" and its implications for certifications and risk management — Forescout Vedere Labs, 2022
- Over 80 US Municipalities' Sensitive Information, Including Resident's Personal Data, Left Vulnerable in Massive Data Breach — WizCase, 2021
- 1,000 GB of local government data exposed by Massachusetts software company — Jonathan Greig, 2021
- AWS Foundational Security Best Practices controls — Amazon, 2022
- Authentication and authorization in Azure App Service and Azure Functions — Microsoft, 2021
- Authentication and authorization use cases — Google Cloud, 2022
- State-of-the-Art Resources (SOAR) for Software Vulnerability Detection, Test, and Evaluation — Gregory Larsen, E. Kenneth Hong Fong, David A. Wheeler, Rama S. Moorthy, 2014
Wpis z katalogu CWE 4.20.