Katalog CWE

CWE-306 · Słabość

Missing Authentication for Critical Function

Abstrakcja
Bazowa
Status
Szkic
Ryzyko wykorzystania
wysokie
Dodano
19 lipca 2006
Ostatnia zmiana
11 grudnia 2025

Podatności CVE z tą słabościąPełny wpis na cwe.mitre.org ↗

Opis

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

Skutki

  • Access Control, Other

    Gain Privileges or Assume Identity; Varies by Context

    Exposing critical functionality essentially provides an attacker with the privilege level of that functionality. The consequences will depend on the associated functionality, but they can range from reading or modifying sensitive data, accessing administrative or other privileged functionality, or possibly even executing arbitrary code.

Zapobieganie

  • Architecture and Design

    Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability.

    Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port.

    In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.

  • Architecture and Design

    For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

  • Architecture and Design

    Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks.

    In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.

  • Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks

    Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

    For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].

  • Implementation, System Configuration, Operation

    When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].

Przykłady podatności

Słabość nadrzędna

Słabości podrzędne

Kiedy powstaje

Dotyczy

Not Language-Specific, Cloud Computing, ICS/OT

Źródła

  1. The Art of Software Security Assessment — Mark Dowd, John McDonald, Justin Schuh, Chapter 2, "Common Vulnerabilities of Authentication," Page 36, Addison Wesley, 2006
  2. Top 25 Series - Rank 19 - Missing Authentication for Critical Function — Frank Kim, SANS Software Security Institute, 2010
  3. OWASP Enterprise Security API (ESAPI) Project — OWASP
  4. OT:ICEFALL: The legacy of "insecure by design" and its implications for certifications and risk management — Forescout Vedere Labs, 2022
  5. Over 80 US Municipalities' Sensitive Information, Including Resident's Personal Data, Left Vulnerable in Massive Data Breach — WizCase, 2021
  6. 1,000 GB of local government data exposed by Massachusetts software company — Jonathan Greig, 2021
  7. AWS Foundational Security Best Practices controls — Amazon, 2022
  8. Authentication and authorization in Azure App Service and Azure Functions — Microsoft, 2021
  9. Authentication and authorization use cases — Google Cloud, 2022
  10. State-of-the-Art Resources (SOAR) for Software Vulnerability Detection, Test, and Evaluation — Gregory Larsen, E. Kenneth Hong Fong, David A. Wheeler, Rama S. Moorthy, 2014

Wpis z katalogu CWE 4.20.