Katalog CWE

CWE-99 · Słabość

Improper Control of Resource Identifiers ('Resource Injection')

Abstrakcja
Klasa
Status
Szkic
Ryzyko wykorzystania
wysokie
Dodano
19 lipca 2006
Ostatnia zmiana
11 grudnia 2025

Podatności CVE z tą słabościąPełny wpis na cwe.mitre.org ↗

Opis

The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not restrict or incorrectly restricts the input before it is used as an identifier for a resource that may be outside the intended sphere of control.

A resource injection issue occurs when the following two conditions are met:

1. An attacker can specify the identifier used to access a system resource. For example, an attacker might be able to specify part of the name of a file to be opened or a port number to be used.

1. By specifying the resource, the attacker gains a capability that would not otherwise be permitted. For example, the program may give the attacker the ability to overwrite the specified file, run with a configuration controlled by the attacker, or transmit sensitive information to a third-party server.

This may enable an attacker to access or modify otherwise protected system resources.

Inne nazwy

Insecure Direct Object Reference
OWASP uses this term, although it is effectively the same as resource injection.

Skutki

  • Confidentiality, Integrity

    Read Application Data; Modify Application Data; Read Files or Directories; Modify Files or Directories

    An attacker could gain access to or modify sensitive data or system resources. This could allow access to protected files or directories including configuration files and files containing sensitive information.

Zapobieganie

  • Implementation · Input Validation

    Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

    When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."

    Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, it can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

Przykłady podatności

Słabość nadrzędna

Pokrewna

Może też być

Słabości podrzędne

Kiedy powstaje

Dotyczy

Not Language-Specific

Uwagi

Resource injection that involves resources stored on the filesystem goes by the name path manipulation (CWE-73).

The relationship between CWE-99 and CWE-610 needs further investigation and clarification. They might be duplicates. CWE-99 "Resource Injection," as originally defined in Seven Pernicious Kingdoms taxonomy, emphasizes the "identifier used to access a system resource" such as a file name or port number, yet it explicitly states that the "resource injection" term does not apply to "path manipulation," which effectively identifies the path at which a resource can be found and could be considered to be one aspect of a resource identifier. Also, CWE-610 effectively covers any type of resource, whether that resource is at the system layer, the application layer, or the code layer.

Źródła

  1. Seven Pernicious Kingdoms: A Taxonomy of Software Security Errors — Katrina Tsipenyuk, Brian Chess, Gary McGraw, NIST, 2005
  2. Automated Source Code Security Measure (ASCSM) — Object Management Group (OMG), ASCSM-CWE-99, 2016

Wpis z katalogu CWE 4.20.