Katalog CWE

CWE-602 · Słabość

Client-Side Enforcement of Server-Side Security

Abstrakcja
Klasa
Status
Szkic
Ryzyko wykorzystania
średnie
Dodano
7 maja 2007
Ostatnia zmiana
11 grudnia 2025

Podatności CVE z tą słabościąPełny wpis na cwe.mitre.org ↗

Opis

The product is composed of a server that relies on the client to implement a mechanism that is intended to protect the server.

When the server relies on protection mechanisms placed on the client side, an attacker can modify the client-side behavior to bypass the protection mechanisms, resulting in potentially unexpected interactions between the client and server. The consequences will vary, depending on what the mechanisms are trying to protect.

Skutki

  • Access Control, Availability

    Bypass Protection Mechanism; DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart

    Client-side validation checks can be easily bypassed, allowing malformed or unexpected input to pass into the application, potentially as trusted data. This may lead to unexpected states, behaviors and possibly a resulting crash.

  • Access Control

    Bypass Protection Mechanism; Gain Privileges or Assume Identity

    Client-side checks for authentication can be easily bypassed, allowing clients to escalate their access levels and perform unintended actions.

Zapobieganie

  • Architecture and Design

    For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

    Even though client-side checks provide minimal benefits with respect to server-side security, they are still useful. First, they can support intrusion detection. If the server receives input that should have been rejected by the client, then it may be an indication of an attack. Second, client-side error-checking can provide helpful feedback to the user about the expectations for valid input. Third, there may be a reduction in server-side processing time for accidental input errors, although this is typically a small savings.

  • Architecture and Design

    If some degree of trust is required between the two entities, then use integrity checking and strong authentication to ensure that the inputs are coming from a trusted source. Design the product so that this trust is managed in a centralized fashion, especially if there are complex or numerous communication channels, in order to reduce the risks that the implementer will mistakenly omit a check in a single code path.

Przykłady podatności

Słabość nadrzędna

Może prowadzić do

Pokrewna

Słabości podrzędne

Kiedy powstaje

Dotyczy

Not Language-Specific, ICS/OT, Mobile

Źródła

  1. Writing Secure Code — Michael Howard, David LeBlanc, Chapter 23, "Client-Side Security Is an Oxymoron" Page 687, Microsoft Press, 2002
  2. OT:ICEFALL: The legacy of "insecure by design" and its implications for certifications and risk management — Forescout Vedere Labs, 2022

Wpis z katalogu CWE 4.20.