Katalog CWE

CWE-367 · Słabość

Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition

Abstrakcja
Bazowa
Status
Niekompletny
Ryzyko wykorzystania
średnie
Dodano
19 lipca 2006
Ostatnia zmiana
11 grudnia 2025

Podatności CVE z tą słabościąPełny wpis na cwe.mitre.org ↗

Opis

The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check.

Inne nazwy

TOCTTOU
The TOCTTOU acronym expands to "Time Of Check To Time Of Use".
TOCCTOU
The TOCCTOU acronym is most likely a typo of TOCTTOU, but it has been used in some influential documents, so the typo is repeated fairly frequently.

Skutki

  • Integrity, Other

    Alter Execution Logic; Unexpected State

    The attacker can gain access to otherwise unauthorized resources.

  • Integrity, Other

    Modify Application Data; Modify Files or Directories; Modify Memory; Other

    Race conditions such as this kind may be employed to gain read or write access to resources which are not normally readable or writable by the user in question.

  • Integrity, Other

    Other

    The resource in question, or other resources (through the corrupted one), may be changed in undesirable ways by a malicious user.

  • Non-Repudiation

    Hide Activities

    If a file or other resource is written in this method, as opposed to in a valid way, logging of the activity may not occur.

  • Non-Repudiation, Other

    Other

    In some cases it may be possible to delete files a malicious user might not otherwise have access to, such as log files.

  • Other

    Unexpected State

    The product may perform invalid actions when the resource is in an unexpected state.

Zapobieganie

  • Implementation

    The most basic advice for TOCTOU vulnerabilities is to not perform a check before the use. This does not resolve the underlying issue of the execution of a function on a resource whose state and identity cannot be assured, but it does help to limit the false sense of security given by the check.

  • Implementation

    When the file being altered is owned by the current user and group, set the effective gid and uid to that of the current user and group when executing this statement.

  • Architecture and Design

    Limit the interleaving of operations on files from multiple processes.

  • Implementation, Architecture and Design

    If you cannot perform operations atomically and you must share access to the resource between multiple processes or threads, then try to limit the amount of time (CPU cycles) between the check and use of the resource. This will not fix the problem, but it could make it more difficult for an attack to succeed.

  • Implementation

    Recheck the resource after the use call to verify that the action was taken appropriately.

  • Architecture and Design

    Ensure that some environmental locking mechanism can be used to protect resources effectively.

  • Implementation

    Ensure that locking occurs before the check, as opposed to afterwards, such that the resource, as checked, is the same as it is when in use.

Przykłady podatności

Słabość nadrzędna

Słabości podrzędne

Kiedy powstaje

Dotyczy

Not Language-Specific

Uwagi

TOCTOU issues do not always involve symlinks, and not every symlink issue is a TOCTOU problem.

Non-symlink TOCTOU issues are not reported frequently, but they are likely to occur in code that attempts to be secure.

Źródła

  1. The CLASP Application Security Process — Secure Software, Inc., 5.4.6 Race condition in switch, 2005
  2. Portably Solving File TOCTTOU Races with Hardness Amplification — Dan Tsafrir, Tomer Hertz, David Wagner, Dilma Da Silva, 2008
  3. 24 Deadly Sins of Software Security — Michael Howard, David LeBlanc, John Viega, "Sin 13: Race Conditions." Page 205, McGraw-Hill, 2010
  4. The Art of Software Security Assessment — Mark Dowd, John McDonald, Justin Schuh, Chapter 9, "TOCTOU", Page 527, Addison Wesley, 2006

Wpis z katalogu CWE 4.20.