Katalog CWE

CWE-191 · Słabość

Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)

Abstrakcja
Bazowa
Status
Szkic
Dodano
19 lipca 2006
Ostatnia zmiana
11 grudnia 2025

Podatności CVE z tą słabościąPełny wpis na cwe.mitre.org ↗

Opis

The product subtracts one value from another, such that the result is less than the minimum allowable integer value, which produces a value that is not equal to the correct result.

This can happen in signed and unsigned cases.

Inne nazwy

Integer underflow
"Integer underflow" is sometimes used to identify signedness errors in which an originally positive number becomes negative as a result of subtraction. However, there are cases of bad subtraction in which unsigned integers are involved, so it's not always a signedness issue. "Integer underflow" is occasionally used to describe array index errors in which the index is negative.

Skutki

  • Availability

    DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart; DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU); DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); DoS: Instability

    This weakness will generally lead to undefined behavior and therefore crashes. In the case of overflows involving loop index variables, the likelihood of infinite loops is also high.

  • Integrity

    Modify Memory

    If the value in question is important to data (as opposed to flow), simple data corruption has occurred. Also, if the wrap around results in other conditions such as buffer overflows, further memory corruption may occur.

  • Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control

    Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Bypass Protection Mechanism

    This weakness can sometimes trigger buffer overflows which can be used to execute arbitrary code. This is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.

Przykłady podatności

Słabość nadrzędna

Kiedy powstaje

Dotyczy

C, C++, Java, C#

Źródła

  1. 24 Deadly Sins of Software Security — Michael Howard, David LeBlanc, John Viega, "Sin 7: Integer Overflows." Page 119, McGraw-Hill, 2010

Wpis z katalogu CWE 4.20.